NEET-UG 2024 Physics Wala and J Sai Deepak Challenging the NTA in SC
![NEET-UG 2024 Physics Wala and J Sai Deepak Challenging the NTA in SC](https://socialmela.in/uploads/images/image_750x_666ad5712154a.jpg)
NEET-UG 2024: Physics Wala and J Sai Deepak Challenging the NTA in SC
What is the matter?
A significant legal issue has emerged regarding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) 2024. He challenges the decision of the National Testing Agency (NTA) to award grace marks to over 1,500 candidates who took the NEET UG 2024 exam, which is essential for admission to undergraduate medical courses.
Alakh Pandey, the Chief Executive of the EdTech company 'Physics Wala,' has filed a petition in the Supreme Court. Physics Wallah Private Limited, also known as Physics Wallah or PW, is an Indian ed-tech company based in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. It was started by Alakh Pandey in 2016 as a YouTube channel to teach physics for the Joint Entrance Examinations (JEE).
Pandey's petition argues that these grace marks, which range between 70 to 80, were awarded carelessly. He stated that such marks distort the examination fairness and compromise the merit of the candidate and their selection. Alakh Pandey has also appealed a petition to the Supreme Court to establish an expert committee to investigate the NEET UG 2024 examination process and results thoroughly.
What is the say of Jai Sai Deepak?
Jai Sai Deepak is an Indian Supreme Court Lawyer and public speaker. He is famous for his representation in the case of Sabarimala Temple regarding the entry of women. Deepak has done a lot of work in the world of law such as marital rape exception, protection of women from violence act, 2005. He has written 2 books named India that is Bharat: Coloniality, Civilization, Constitution, and India; India, Bharat, and Pakistan: The Constitutional Journey of a Sandwiched Civilization. He is a famous personality in today's youth.
He is the legal representative for Alakh Pandey and mentioned that numerous petitions have already been filed regarding NEET UG 2024. Some of these petitions address concerns of a paper leak before the exam results were announced, and the court has issued notices for these cases. However, Pandey's petition is unique in its focus on carelessly awarding grace marks.
What does the Education Minister say:
Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan addressed the Supreme Court hearing on the NEET-UG 2024 exam, assuring students and parents of the Indian government's and NTA's commitment to justice. He stated that 24 lakh students completed the NEET exam and emphasized that there is no evidence of a paper leak. A court-recommended model was implemented for approximately 1,560 students, and a panel of academicians has been established to oversee the matter. Pradhan also stated that the government would respect the Court's decision.
Here are the points, well-briefed:
- Pandey's petition is supported by around 20,000 student signatures.
- These students oppose the grace marks, arguing they:
- Unfairly benefited a selective group.
- Undermine the exam's competitive nature.
- Diminish the credibility of the results.
Supreme Court’s Answer to the Issue:
The Supreme Court has indicated that Pandey's petition will be considered alongside other related cases. However, the court has clarified that it will not stop the ongoing counseling process for NEET UG 2024 admissions at this stage. This means that while the legal proceedings are underway, the process of admitting students to medical colleges based on the current results will continue. The issue revolves around the fairness and transparency of the NEET UG 2024 exam, with the Supreme Court being asked to intervene and ensure that the examination process upholds its integrity and that any irregularities are addressed appropriately.
If you enjoyed this post, I’d be very grateful if you’d help it spread by emailing it to a friend or sharing it on Twitter or Facebook. Do not forget to like on Facebook and follow us on Instagram. Send your entries too…
Thank you! Signing off
-Team Social Mela
Comments (0)